Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of BRS with other angioplasty techniques/ devices (Iqbal et al. 2014)

From: Experimental and computational studies of poly-L-lactic acid for cardiovascular applications: recent progress

 

POBA

BMS

DES

BRS

Acute occlusion

−

+

+

+

Acute recoil

−

+

+

+

Acute thrombosis

−

−

−

−

Sub-acute thrombosis

±

−

−

−

Late thrombosis

+

−

−

±

Very late thrombosis

+

±

−/ ±

+/?

Neointimal hyperplasia

−

−

+

+

Constrictive remodelling

−

+

+

+

Adaptive (expansive) remodelling

+

−

−

+

Restoration of vasomotion

+

−

−

+

Late luminal enlargement

+

−

−

+

  1. [POBA - plain old balloon angioplasty; BMS - bare metal stent; DES - drug eluting stent; BRS - bioresorbable scaffold; + − positive/beneficial; − - negative/ no effect; ± − neutral or uncertain effect;? - lack of definitive evidence] No with direct comparison study of four techniques therefore, the table is compiled based on non-comparative data (Iqbal et al. 2014)]