Postbuckled equilibrium state of axially compressed polymeric rod in glass and rubbery transitions
 Ksenia Alekseevna Tikhomirova^{1}Email author and
 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Trufanov^{2}
https://doi.org/10.1186/s4075901600087
© Tikhomirova and Trufanov. 2016
Received: 10 September 2015
Accepted: 13 January 2016
Published: 22 January 2016
Abstract
Background
Glass and rubbery transitions under cooling and heating of polymeric materials underlie a shape memory effect, that is a material ability to save temporarily the deformed shape and restore the original one under the external influence. The present work aims to model the shape memory effect for an axially compressed polymeric rod in its postbuckled equilibrium state, which is the generalization of Euler’s elastica for a glassy material case.
Methods
For modeling, we use a new type of constitutive relations describing the thermomechanical behavior of amorphous polymers over a wide temperature range. To define the model parameters for lightlylinked epoxy resin a series of experiments was conducted using the Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer.
Results
Postbuckled states of an epoxy rod equilibrium during the temperature change have been found from numerical simulation. The obtained results illustrate the shape memory effect in case of axially compressed rod buckling.
Conclusion
The thermomechanical shapememory cycle includes the stages of deformation development and preservation and the subsequent recovery of the initial shape. According to the obtained results, maximum deflection corresponds to the first loading step at the rubbery material state, because the elastic modulus is very low. During cooling under a constant load the deformation remains constant. After unloading in glassy state the deflection decreases by a small value, because the glassy elastic modulus significantly exceeds the rubbery one. During subsequent heating the rod recovers its initial undeformed shape.
Keywords
Background
Due to a highmolecular structure polymeric materials are very temperaturedependent in their mechanical properties. Glass and rubbery transitions under cooling and heating are a good illustration of such dependence. Mechanical effects occurring during glass transition, particularly for epoxy resins, are wellinvestigated (Liu et al. 2004, Michels et al. 2015, Shardakov et al. 1991). A large number of studies have reported on modeling these effects for the case of small deformations. Two formal groups could be derived from the studies: the models of instantaneous elastic relaxation or phase transition (Bartenev and Barteneva 1992, Bugakov 1989, Klychnikov et al. 1980) and the models based on the postulates of the nonisothermal viscous elasticity (Bolotin 1972, Il’ushin and Pobedria 1970, Moskvitin 1972). The approach used in the present study (Matveenko et al. 2012) occupies an intermediate position between these two.
Glass transition of amorphous polymers underlies a shape memory effect, that is a material ability to save temporarily the deformed shape and restore the original one under the external influence, e.g. heat. Shape memory polymers (SMP) are capable of very large recoverable strains. Such materials have been used extensively in medicine (Yakacki and Gall 2010, Yakacki et al. 2007, Sharifi et al. 2013), microelectronics and some other industrial fields (Hager et al. 2015).
Present work aims to model the shape memory effect for an axially compressed polymeric rod in its postbuckled equilibrium state. The problem of postbuckled behavior of axially compressed rods is welldocumented in literature (Krylov 1931, Vol’mir 1967, Rabotnov 1988). Our study generalizes the existing analytical solutions for the case of an SMP rod thermomechanical loading.
Methods
Constitutive equations for glassy material
Glass transition is accompanied by changes of mechanical properties in transition through the region with T _{ g1} and T _{ g2} temperature bounds, which is connected with the molecular mobility restriction. The material comes to its glassy state at temperatures below T _{ g1} and to rubbery state at temperatures above T _{ g2}.
 1)the characteristic times of the external actions are much shorter than the relaxation times in the glassy state (T < T _{ g1}, Fig. 1), so the loading process occurs more rapidly than the relaxation process;
 2)
the characteristic times of the external actions essentially exceed the limits of the relaxation spectrum of a highly elastic polymer (T > T _{ g2}, Fig. 1), so all the relaxation processes finish during the loading.
With these hypotheses, beyond the limits of the glass transition interval the examined material can be considered as an elastic medium, but with different elastic moduli: E _{1} —the Young’s modulus for the material in the rubbery state, E _{1} + E _{2} —in the glassy state (E _{2} is the difference between the glassy and rubbery moduli, for many polymeric materials E _{1} < < E _{2}). We assume that the polymer behavior within the glass transition interval at a decreasing temperature is specified by the growth of the mechanical rigidity due to a gradual decrease in the segmental mobility and an increase in the energy of the intermolecular interactions.
To model such an effect we introduce the conversion degree parameter N(T) (Fig. 1) which characterizes the degree of restriction in the segmental mobility of the polymer and changes from 0 (T > T _{ g2}) to 1 (T < T _{ g1}).
where σ is the axial stress, t —the current time, ɛ and ɛ _{ T } —the full and temperature strains, ɛ ^{*} and ɛ _{ T } ^{*} —the full and temperature strains at t = τ ^{*}; τ ^{*} is the corresponding time under the cooling conditions when N(τ ^{*}) = N(τ). The values of ɛ ^{*} and ɛ _{ T } ^{*} are stored or frozen at the stage of vitrification and remain unchanged during the inverse transition from the glassy to rubbery state. During cooling the increase of N(T) and the concurrent rigidity increase within the transition region correspond to the growth of intermolecular interaction bonds. We assume every newly formed bond to deform concurrently with the rest of the material, which is reflected in the difference form of the integrands in (1). Thus, the physical relations (1) imply that the temperaturedeformation history should be reckoned from the temperature T _{ h } (higher than T _{ g2}), at which the polymer is in the equilibrium rubbery state.
Constitutive equations (1) enable us to describe the developing residual stresses and frozen strains under cooling and, correspondingly, the shape memory effect. Physically, the initiation of frozen strains is concerned with the rapidly developing relaxation processes under loading in the rubbery state (according to the hypothesis 2), which result in deformations corresponding to the elastic modulus E _{1}. After the vitrification due to cooling and subsequent unloading, only a small part of the total strain corresponding to the elastic modulus E _{1} + E _{2} recovers. The other, bigger part of the total strain remains frozen, since the characteristic relaxation times in the glassy state significantly exceed the limits required for the total strain recovery (hypothesis 1).
Numerical modeling
where γ _{ L } is the widthlike parameter for the transition region, and T _{ g } is the parameter specifying the transition temperature.
where T _{ gα } is the mean temperature of the transition region, α _{1} and α _{2} —the LTEC for the rubbery and glassy material states respectively.
Thus, the numerical model defined through the relations (1)–(4) includes seven independent parameters: E _{1}, E _{2}, α _{1}, α _{2}, γL, T _{ g } and T _{ gα }.
Experiments
It has been established from the experimental data that the variation of the heat rate results in the thermomechanical curve shifting along the temperature axis. In this work we do not consider the heat rate influence on the thermomechanical material behavior and take the rate value as a constant.
A simple compression test at room temperature under the small strain level has also been conducted, and the value of glassy elastic modulus E _{1} + E _{2} = 0, 77 GPa was obtained.
Identification of model parameters
Based on the experimental data obtained in the previous section, the parameters of the numerical model were defined.
The value of T _{ gα } related to the inflection point of the thermomechanical curve in the middle of the transition region is taken 80°С. The glass transition bounds were taken as T _{ g1} = 55 ˚ С and T _{ g2} = 105 ˚ С according to the shape of the thermomechanical curve (Fig. 2).
where n is the node number and Δε _{ i } —the difference between the experimental and theoretical deformation values in the i node. For the functional minimization we use the quasiNewton method of linear search. The iteration process stops when the current increment of the minimization parameter becomes less than 10^{−6}.
When the values of α _{1}, α _{2} and E _{1} are defined, we find T _{ g } and γL by minimizing the functional discrepancy (5) within the transition temperature region. We use the same quasiNewton method; for the parameter T _{ g } the normalizing factor 0.1 was introduced.
From the functional minimization the following values of the model parameters were found: α _{1} = 15.77 * 10^{−5}, α _{2} = 1.69 * 10^{−5}, E _{1} = 296.76 kPa, T _{ g } = 36.62 ˚ С, and γL = 6.17 ˚ С, which correspond to the mean square discrepancy of 7.17*10^{−4}. The resultant approximation of experimental data with the numerical model is shown in Fig. 2.
Bending of axially compressed polymeric rod under temperature change. Problem formulation
 1)
Loading with the force P at an initial temperature greater than T _{ g2}(N = 0);
 2)
Cooling under a constant load to a temperature less than T _{ g1};
 3)
Unloading (N = 1); and
 4)
Heating to the initial temperature.
where s is the curvilinear axial coordinate with the zero point lying on the rod boundary, χ ^{*} —the curvature at t = τ ^{*}; τ ^{*} is the same as in (1). Here we do not consider the temperature expansion.

Constitutive equations (6);

Geometrical relations:

Boundary conditions:

zero boundary curvature: \( {\left.\frac{\partial \varTheta }{\partial s}\right}_{s=0}=0; \)

a symmetry condition: Θ_{ s = l/2} = 0.
where \( F={\displaystyle \underset{0}{\overset{\pi /2}{\int }}\frac{d\phi }{\sqrt{1{m}^2{ \sin}^2\phi }}} \) and \( F\left(\phi \right)={\displaystyle \underset{0}{\overset{\phi }{\int }}\frac{d\phi }{\sqrt{1{m}^2{ \sin}^2\phi }}} \) are the first type elliptic integrals. Upon substituting the boundary condition ϕ_{ s=l/2} = 0 into (10) we obtain \( F=\sqrt{\frac{P}{E_1I}}\cdot \frac{l}{2}, \) from which the value m for every particular load P could be unambiguously found. Then we can straightforwardly move from the relations Θ(ϕ) (9) and s(ϕ) (10) to the relation Θ(s), and find the curvature χ _{1}(s) for the first loading stage from the geometrical equations (7).
During the loading stage 2 the load remains unchanged. According to the accepted hypotheses, every additional bond formed during vitrification is undeformed at its initiation moment, and so it does not affect the stressstrain state of the construction at that moment (Matveenko et al. 2012). Therefore, the curvature during cooling under a constant load remains unchanged: χ _{2}(s) = χ _{1}(s).
Thus, at stage 3, after unloading, with N = 1 the curvature is \( {\chi}_3\left(t,s\right)=\frac{E_2}{E_1+{E}_2}{\chi}_2\left(t,s\right). \) The value \( \frac{E_2}{E_1+{E}_2}<1, \) which corresponds to the curvature decrease after unloading.
During heating of the unloaded rod (stage 4) its curvature is defined as \( {\chi}_4\left(t,s\right)=\frac{E_2N\left(T(t)\right)}{E_1+{E}_2N\left(T(t)\right)}{\chi}_2\left(t,s\right), \) which follows from (11). At the final temperature, the conversion degree parameter N = 0, therefore χ = 0, i.e. the rod is fully straightened.
Results and discussion
In this section, we specify the problem formulated in the previous section for the 50 mm epoxy resin rod with a circular crosssection of 5 mm diameter. The material characteristics were found from the experiments described above.
As one can see in Figs. 5 and 6, maximum deflection corresponds to the first loading step at the rubbery material state, because the elastic modulus is very low at this temperature. The road being linear under a load less than the critical one causes the break of the curve (Fig. 6, stage 1). The increase in load leads to buckling and a further nonlinear increase in deflection.
At the second stage—cooling under a constant load—the deformation remains constant. Here, according to the accepted hypotheses, the additional bond formation occurs, and every new bond is undeformed at its initiation moment. Therefore, the rigidity increase does not lead to additional strains and stresses.
At the third stage, after unloading the deflection decreases by a small value of about 0.8 % compared to the one at the first stage, because the elastic modulus at this temperature significantly exceeds the initial one. During subsequent heating (stage 4) the rod progressively straightens because of the molecular mobility growth, and the deformations frozen at stage 2 release.
Conclusions
In this research, we have studied the thermomechanical behavior of an axially compressed epoxy rod in its postbuckled equilibrium state. The thermomechanical shapememory cycle has been modeled, which includes the stages of deformation development and preservation and the subsequent recovery of the initial shape. The material parameters included in constitutive equations were found from thermomechanical experiments. As a result, the deformed shapes of the rod in its postbuckled equilibrium state under changing temperature conditions have been obtained, and the shape memory effect has been illustrated.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project number 130100553а).
We are especially grateful to prof. IN Shardakov of ICMM UB RAS and lead engineer SN Lysenko of ITC UB RAS for supplying materials and experimental support.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Bartenev GM, Barteneva AG (1992) Relaxation Properties of Polymers. Chemistry, MoscowGoogle Scholar
 Bolotin VV (1972) To the theory of viscous elasticity for structurally unstable operators. Works of MEI Dyn. Strength Mach 101:7–14Google Scholar
 Bronshtein IN, Semendjaiev KA (1986) Mathematics Reference Book for Engineers and Students of Technical Institutes. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
 Bugakov II (1989) Constitutive equations for materials with phase transition. J Mech Solids 3:111–117Google Scholar
 Hager MD, Bodea S, Weber C, Schubert US (2015) Shape memory polymers: past, present and future developments. Prog Polym Sci 49–50:3–33. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.04.002 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Il’ushin AA, Pobedria BE (1970) Fundamentals of the mathematical theory of thermoviscous elasticity. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
 Klychnikov LV, Davtjan SP, Khudjaiev SI, Enikolopjan NS (1980) On the effect of inhomogeneous temperature field on the distribution of residual stresses under frontal solidification conditions. J Mech Compos Mater 13:509–513Google Scholar
 Krylov AN (1931) About equilibrium forms of compressed columns under longitudinal bending. Izvestija Akademii nauk SSSR. VII series. Otdelenie matematicheskih i estestvennyh nauk 7:963–1012Google Scholar
 Liu H, Uhlherr A, Bannister MK (2004) Quantitative structure–property relationships for composites: prediction of glass transition temperatures for epoxy resins. Polymer 45(6):2051–2060. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.008 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Matveenko VP, Smetannikov OY, Trufanov NA, Shardakov IN (2012) Models of thermomechanical behavior of polymeric materials undergoing glass transition. J Acta Mech 223:1261–1284. doi:10.1007/s007070120626z View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Michels J, Widmann R, Czaderski C, Allahvirdizadeh R, Motavalli M (2015) Glass transition evaluation of commercially available epoxy resins used for civil engineering applications. J Composites Part B Eng 77:484–493. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.053 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Moskvitin VV (1972) The strength of viscoelastic materials as applied to solid propellant charges of rocket engines. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
 Rabotnov YN (1988) Mechanics of deformed solid body. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
 Shardakov IN, Trufanov NA, Begishev VP, Shadrin OA (1991) Description of hereditary effects during vitrification and softening of epoxy resins. J Plasticheskie massy 9:55–58Google Scholar
 Sharifi S, van Kooten TG, Kranenburg HJC, Meij BP, Behl M, Lendlein A, Grijpma DW (2013) An annulus fibrosus closure device based on a biodegradable shapememory polymer network. J Biomaterials 34:8105–8113. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.061 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Vol’mir AS (1967) Stability of deformed systems. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
 Yakacki CM, Gall K (2010) Shapememory polymers for biomedical applications. In: Lendlein A (ed) Shapememory polymers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, BerlinGoogle Scholar
 Yakacki CM, Shandas R, Lanning C, Rech B, Eckstein A, Gall K (2007) Unconstrained recovery characterization of shapememory polymer networks for cardiovascular applications. J Biomaterials 28:2255–2263. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.030 View ArticleGoogle Scholar