 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Measurement of thirdorder elastic constants and stress dependent coefficients for steels
Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Modern Processes volume 4, Article number: 2 (2018)
Abstract
Background
There has been little discussion of the thirdorder elastic constants of steels in the literature until now. In this study, the precise second and thirdorder elastic constants of polycrystalline steels were measured under adiabatic and isothermal conditions.
Method
To measure the minute change in the propagation time of the elastic wave corresponding to the tensile stress, the uniform and isotropic specimens were processed with high precision, the measuring instruments were strictly calibrated, and the temperature of the measurement chamber was kept constant. The author proposes an experimental formula to obtain the thirdorder elastic constants of steels. The stress dependent coefficients α_{ ij } in this formula are absolutely necessary to obtain the thirdorder elastic constants.
Results
The obtained stress dependent coefficients clearly indicated that there is a special relationship between the directions of stress and that of the oscillation of the elastic wave. When the frequency direction of the elastic wave matched the direction of the applied stress, α_{ ij } became a larger negative value. Lamè constants and Murnaghan’s thirdorder elastic constants ℓ,m,n were obtained for four types of steels.
Conclusions
The second and thirdorder elastic constants under adiabatic conditions were smaller than those under isothermal conditions. Oscillation of crystal lattice is nonlinear and this is observed as the thirdorder elastic constants. Therefore, it is possible to obtain the knowledge on the internal stress and the thermal properties of the materials. This is also the basis of theoretical discussion of the thermal expansion coefficients.
Introduction
The first study of the theory and measurement of the thirdorder elastic constants of practical materials was published by Hughes and Kelly (1953). D.Lazarus reported the thirdorder elastic constants of the single crystals like KCl, Cu etc by measureing propagation velocity of elastic wave under hydrostatic pressure (Lazarus 1949) and it may useful in comparison of the theories of finite strain proposed by Murnagham (1951). R.N.Thurston published a paper on the theoretical analysis of the propagation of elastic wave (Thurston and Brugger 1964). D.M. Egle et al. carried out the measurement of the thirdorder elastic constants for rail steel using Hughes’s result (Egle and Bray 1976). S.Takahashi got the U.S.patent on the stress measurement and its equipment according to the method of the present paper (Takahashi 2007). T.Batemen et al. reported that the thirdorder elastic constant of semiconductor was related to thermal expansion coefficient and Gűneisen constants (Bateman et al. 1961). As described above, the knowledge on the thirdorder elastic constants contributes to the study of physical properties of various materials.
This paper describes the measurement of the thirdorder elastic constants of four common steels. The stress applied to the specimen was increased stepwise, and the velocity of the elastic wave was measured at every step using a high accuracy measuring technique. The shape and dimensions of the specimen were controlled as precisely as possible and the measuring equipment was also accurately calibrated. The change in room temperature was kept to 1°C or less during the measurement. Second and thirdorder elastic constants contribute to the change in the propagation velocity of the elastic wave caused by stress (Hughes and Kelly 1953; Takahashi and Motegi 2015).
The author proposed a simple equation of the propagation velocity under stress by introducing the coefficient α_{ ij } including the second and thirdorder elastic constants. The value of α_{ ij } can be obtained from the measured stress and the change ratio in propagation velocity. The coefficients α_{ ij } is absolutely necessary to obtain the thirdorder elastic constants. When the frequency direction of the elastic wave matched the direction of the applied stress, the value of α_{ ij } became more negative. This means that the coincidence of the frequency direction with the applied stress greatly contributed to the propagation velocity of the wave. The value of α_{ ij } is based on the stressstrain relation. Therefore it is necessary to obtain the vales of α_{ ij } on this relationship.
Experimental method
Test specimen
Figure 1 shows the dimensions and coordinates of the test specimens. The specimens were designed to be attached to the tensile testing machine and make it easy to measure their elastic waves. Coordinates numbered 1, 2, and 3 were used instead of x, y, and z. The long axis direction of the specimen was denoted 1, and the directions perpendicular to it were denoted 2 and 3. The propagation velocity of the longitudinal wave in direction 1 was expressed as V_{11}, while that of the transvers wave to direction 1 and vibration in direction 2 was expressed as V_{12}. For the propagation velocity V, the same subscripts express the longitudinal wave, while different subscripts express the transverse wave. T_{11} represents the tensile stress in the direction of the long axis of the specimen. Table 1 lists the chemical compositions of the S20C(AISI 1020), S30C(AISI 1030), S40C(AISI 1039) and S50C(AISI 1049) test specimens.
Stress dependent coefficients of elastic wave α _{ ij }
The propagation velocity V_{ ij } of the elastic wave in the specimen under an applied stress of T_{11} is expressed as
where V_{0} is the propagation velocity of the elastic wave under nonloaded state, α_{ ij } is the stress dependent coefficient of the elastic wave, and E is Young’s modulus. The expression of V_{ ij } by Hughes and Kelly (1953) and the authors Takahashi and Motegi (2015) is
where λ, μ are Lamè constants, ℓ,m,n are the Murnaghan’s third order elastic constants, ν is Poisson’s ratio and ρ_{0} is the density in the nondeformed state. The formula (1) is based on an equation previously introduced by the authors Takahashi and Motegi (2015) and it can be rewritten as
From the relations described above, α_{11} is given as follows,
In the same way, the formulae of other α_{22}, α_{21}, α_{12} and α_{23} can be obtained.
For example,
The coefficient α_{ ij } is used to obtain Murnaghan’s thirdorder elastic constants ℓ,m,n as follows.
here a= λ+m
Measurement of the propagation velocity of elastic wave in the applied stress direction
The stress in the gripping regions is complicated and should be eliminated, so two kinds of specimens with identical grip sizes but different gauge length were prepared. Hereafter the symbol a denotes the long specimen while b denotes the short specimen. The propagation times under stress free are written as
where L_{ a }, L_{ b } are the total length of the specimens under stress free conditions, and t_{ a }, t_{ b } are the propagatioon time under applied stress.
The differences in propagation time are written as Δt_{ a }=t_{ a }−t_{0a} and Δt_{ b }=t_{ b }−t_{0b}.
The propagation time in the applied stress direction is obtained from formula (1) as follows,
where L_{ m } is the length of the gauge part in the nonloaded state, L_{ g } is the grip length under the applied stress, V_{ g } is the average velocity of the wave passing through grip part. In the case of a longitudinal wave propagating in the applied stress direction of the long specimen, Δt_{ a }/t_{0a} can be written using an approximate calculation as
Δt_{ a }/t_{0a} and Δt_{ b }/t_{0b} can be obtained by measuring the time of the propagating elastic wave.
In a similar manner, for the short specimen,
The grip and the gauge parts are expressed separately in the above formulae. Using above two formulae, α_{11} is given as
The transvers wave of α_{12} is also obtained from applying the measured Δt_{ a }/t_{0a} and Δt_{ b }/t_{0b} data to the formula (9).
Measurement of propagation velocity of elastic wave in direction orthogonal to the tensile stress axis
The propagation time of the elastic wave t measured at the side of the specimen is defined by the following,
where W is width of the nonloaded specimen, and ν is Poisson’s ratio. From the approximate calculation of formula(10), the coefficient related to the elastic wave in the direction of 2j is given as
The coefficient α_{22} for longitudinal waves and α_{21}, α_{23} for transverse waves can be obtained from formula (11) using the respective value of \(\left (\frac {\Delta t}{t_{0}}\right)\) from the measurements of S20C to S50C specimens.
Measurement equipment
An Instron type tensile testing machine and a computerized strain measurement apparatus were used in this work. The load cell was compensated using the standard gauge. The strain of the specimen was measured by strain gauge adhered on both sides of the gauge region as shown in Fig. 1. Measurement of the propagation time of the elastic wave was performed with a device having a time resolution of 10ns as shown in Fig. 2 (Takahashi and Motegi 1987). The grip holder of the tensile testing machine was designed and manufactured to pull the leading wire of transducer from the both ends of the specimen (Takahashi and Takahashi 2007). PZT type(25MHz) piezoelectric resonators, plates of 10×10mm^{2} in size, were used as transducers for the longitudinal and tansvers waves.
Results
The stress applied to the specimen was increased in steps of 5.4MPa. The stress, strain, Poisson’s ratio, propagation time of longitudinal and transvers waves were measured after each increase. Figure 3 shows the stressstrain curve for S30C sample. Figure 4 shows the relationship between the ratio of change in the propagation time with stress for S30C, obtained by measuring the longitudinal and transvers waves propagating parallel and perpendicular to the stress axis. The coefficient α_{ ij } was obtained by measurering the gradient of the stress vs change ratio of the propagation time curve shown in Fig. 4 to formula (9) and (11) for long and short specimens.
The values of Lamè constant, Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, thirdorder elastic constants and α_{ ij } obtained by the stressstrain curve of tencile testing machine were set as values under isothermal conditions. On the other hand, these obtained from the measured values of the propagating time of the elastic wave were taken as values of adibatic conditions. The measured values of α_{11}, α_{12}, α_{21}, α_{22} and α_{23} in the isothermal and adiabatic states are shown in Table 2. These were different owing to the different elastic constants measured by the tensile test or from the adiabatic elastic wave. The secondorder elastic constants of the isothermal and adiabatic measurements are shown in Table 2 alongside the thirdorder elastic constants.
Figure 5 shows the stress dependent coefficients α_{11}, α_{12}, α_{21}, α_{22} and α_{23} of each specimen. It was clear that α having coordinates 11 or 21 showed a larger negative value. It is considered that the agreement between the stress and oscillation direction of the elastic wave greatly displaced α_{ ij } towards a more negative value. The measured values of the thirdorder elastic constants of each specimen in adiabatic state are shown in Fig. 6.
Discussion
The main goal of this study was to accurately measure the change in the propagation time of elastic waves in the material with stress and obtain a mathematical formula connecting theory and experiments to derive the thirdorder elastic constants. An empirical formula consisting of the stress dependent coefficient α_{ ij } related with the thirdorder elastic constants was obtained based on the mathematical formula derived by Hughes and Kelly (1953) and the present author Takahashi and Motegi (2015). Care was taken in preparing the specimens to precise dimensions, using wellcalibrated measument equipment, and maintaining good temperature control during the measurement to obtain precise α_{ ij } data.
The basis of this experiment is to measure the value of α_{ ij }. The value of α_{ ij } can be obtained from the gradient of changing ratio of elastic wave propagation time to the applied stress. Therefore from this viewpoint, α_{ ij } should be determined. When the direction of the stress matches the direction of the vibration wave, α_{ ij } has a larger negative value compared with in the other cases. It means the decrease of propagation velocity of the elastic wave. Thus, this coefficient α_{ ij } also has a relationship to the propagation velocity of the elastic waves. Murnaghan’s third order elastic constants could be calculated using the obtained coefficients α_{ ij }. As described above, of the obtained thirdorder elastic constants, ℓ, m and n were negative for all specimens.
Table 2(B)(C) show the differences between isothermal and adiabatic elastic constants. The difference in the thirdorder elastic constants are larger than the difference in the secondorder ones. O.M.Krasinikov reported no significant difference between isothermal and adiabatic elastic constants (Krasilnikov 1977). However, there is a relatively large difference between m and n in isothermal state and adiabatic state.
Conclusions

1.
An experimental methods for measuring thirdorder elastic constants accurately and relatively easy was described.

2.
Measurements of the change ratio of propagation time of the elastic wave with respect to the change in the applied stress, stressstrain curves, were performed for four types of practical steel specimens.

3.
A formula relating the experimentally measured values to theory was proposed. This formula consisted of stress, Young’s modulus, the propagation velocity of the elastic wave, stress dependent coefficient α_{ ij }, the values of all of which were measurable.

4.
The two types of speimens with identical grip sizes but different gauge lengths were prepared to eliminate the influence of the grip parts and to apply uniform stress.

5.
A formula for α_{ ij } was proposed using data obtained from long and short specimens.

6.
α_{ ij } was obtained from the gradient of the relationship between the change ratio of the propagation time and stress.

7.
α_{ ij } is not only a coefficient necessary to obtain the thirdorder elastic constants but also provide other information on the behavior of elastic wave propagation. The values of α_{11} and α_{21} where the frequency direction of the elastic wave matched the stress axis, were negative and larger in magnitude than those of the other coefficients. This meant a deceleration of the propagation of the elastic wave.

8.
The Murnaghan’s thirdorder elastic constants ℓ,m,n were obtained for the four types of practical steels under isothermal and adiabatic conditions and those were negative values.

9.
The differences between the values of Lamè constants λ, μ and the Young’s modulus E measured under isothermal and adiabatic conditions were not very large, but a relatively large difference was found in the case of m and n in thirdorder modulus.

10.
The present study of the thirdorder elastic constants of materials will greatly contribute to understanding internal stress, thermal properties, Grűneisen constants and so on of steel, semiconductor and non ferrous metals. The author got U.S.Patent on the stress measurement and its equipment (Takahashi 2007).
Abbreviations
 AISI:

American iron and steel institute
References
Bateman, T, Mason WP, McSkimin HJ (1961) Thirdorder elastic moduli of Germanium. J Appl Phys 32(5):928–936.
Egle, DM, Bray DE (1976) Measurement of acoustoelastic and thirdorder elastic constants for rail steel. J Acoust Soc Am 60(3):741–744.
Hughes, DS, Kelly JL (1953) Second order elastic deformation of solid. Phys Rev 92(5):1145–1149.
Krasilnikov, OM (1977) Temperature dependence of thirdorder elastic constants. Sov Phgs State 19(5):764–768.
Lazarus, D (1949) The variation of the adiabatic elastic constants of KCl, NaCl, CuZn, Cu and Al with pressure to 10,000 bars. Phys Rev 76(4):545–553.
Murnagham, FD (1951) Finite deformation of an elastic solid. Wiley, New York.
Takahashi, S (2007) Stress measurement method and its apparatus. U.S. Patent No. 7299138, December 10.
Takahashi, S, Motegi R (1987) Stress dependency on ultrasonic wave propagation velocity. J Mater Sci 22:1857–1863.
Takahashi, S, Motegi R (2015) Measurement of thirdorder elastic constants and applications to loaded structural materals. Springer Plus July 4:325.
Takahashi, S, Takahashi K (2007) Third order elastic constants of semi continuous casting ingot A3004 aluminium alloy and measurement of stress. J Mater Sci 42:2070–2075.
Thurston, RN, Brugger K (1964) Thirdorder elastic constants and the velocity of small amplitude elastic waves in homogeneously stressed media. A Phys Rev 133(6):A1604–A1612.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Data and materials are available.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Author agrees to publication.
Competing interests
Not applicable.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Additional information
Authors’ information
ST is PhD.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, S. Measurement of thirdorder elastic constants and stress dependent coefficients for steels. Mech Adv Mater Mod Process 4, 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s4075901800357
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Second and thirdorder elastic modulus
 Elastic wave
 Stress dependent coefficient
 Polycrystalline material